Invictus Games ‘want to replace Prince Harry with Mike Tindall’ in huge snub

Prince Harry’s former biographer Angela Levin said the move to oust Harry would be a crushing blow to the Duke of Sussex.

Levin said many in the Invictus Games set-up had become disgruntled with Meghan Markle’s involvement (Image: Getty)

A royal expert has said that Invictus Games could decide to oust Prince Harry amid concerns that the sports event had become “too royal”.

Invictus could also be lining up Mike Tindall, a former rugby union player, to take over from Harry in a shock move.

Royal biographer Angela Levin made the bombshell remarks during an interview with GB News.

She suggested that Mr Tindall, who is married to Zara Tindall, the niece of King Charles, had already been drafted in as an ambassador of the games.

Prince Harry’s former biographer claimed that there had been mutiny at the charity, which allows wounded, injured and sick servicemen and women to compete at a multi-sport event.

Mike Tindall, who is married to Zara Tindall, the niece of King Charles (Image: Getty)

Ms Levin revealed that many in the Invictus Games set-up had become disgruntled with Meghan Markle’s involvement.

She explained: “Mike Tindall has been made a patron of the Invictus Games. I wonder if that is a way to ease Harry out. He has been very nice about Harry.

“It has become too royal. Much too royal. Meghan makes the speeches and she actually led a march with some of the ex-military people who were either physically, emotionally or psychologically damaged during their fighting.

“They were very upset. She knows nothing about how to march and she looked like she was at a dress show. They don’t want that or to hear she is late because she had to give her children a milkshake for three days.

“She gave a speech about how to be strong and fight against things which I think was rather insulting. It has taken away from what is the idea, which is to allow these people to live another life. Harry was marvellous with these people and showing that life is worth living. Now it’s all about Meghan and Harry follows behind.”

The Duke of Sussex returns to the UK in just over a week for a ceremony marking the 10th anniversary of the Invictus Games.

Harry will attend the thanksgiving service at St Paul’s Cathedral, London, on May 8, where he will give a reading.

We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

The next games will be held in Vancouver, Canada, in 2025. (Image: Getty)

He was last seen in the UK in February for a brief visit to see King Charles after his cancer diagnosis, and next week marks the first major event he will have attended in the UK for some time.

The prince first launched the Invictus Games in 2014 in partnership with the Ministry of Defence.

The next games will be held in Vancouver, Canada, in 2025.

HOT NEWS: 

HOT NEWS: ARTHUR EDWARDS REVEALS THAT KING CHARLES KICKED MEGHAN MARKLE OUT OF THE HOUSE AFTER DISCOVERING SHE USED A DOLL TO IMPERSONATE ARCHIE: “HOW DARE SHE DECEIVE!”

Hot news: Arthur Edwards reveals that Prince Charles kicked Meghan Markle out of the house after discovering she used a doll to impersonate Archie: “How dare she deceive!”

The arrival of Archie, Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s eldest child, was deemed a disaster for the press by a royal photographer. Breaking with a long-standing royal tradition, the Sussexes opted out of the customary photo shoot on the steps outside London’s private Portland Hospital following Prince Archie’s birth on May 6, 2019. It wasn’t until two days later that photographers finally captured the first glimpse of the royal baby during a photocall at St. George’s Hall in Windsor Castle.

During an interview with The Sun’s Royal Exclusive, British photographer Arthur Edwards, known for his decades-long work capturing the Royals, criticized Prince Harry and Meghan Markle for stage-managing their son’s birth according to their preferences rather than adhering to the postpartum tradition believed to have originated with Princess Anne in the 80s.

“The whole thing was just stage-managed to suit them,” Edwards claimed about Archie’s birth. The well-known Sun photographer suggested that the press was given incorrect information about when Markle had gone into labor and given birth. “Archie was almost teething before we found out he was born, you know,” Edwards sarcastically told host Matt Wilkinson. “We were led to believe that she’d gone into labor at 2:00 when the baby had been born many hours earlier. We were led to believe it was going to be a home birth and it was in a hospital.”

According to Page Six, Markle had originally planned to give birth to Archie at their then-UK home, Frogmore Cottage, with the help of an all-female midwife team. However, when her son was a week overdue, doctors advised the former Suits star to go to the hospital and deliver there.

Twitter is buzzing with speculation that Lilibet and Archie might not be real, with some suggesting that other mothers are lending their children for photo opportunities. A YouTube video drawing over 77,000 views suggests that Archie could actually be a lifelike doll. On The Daily Empress YouTube channel, a video titled “Meghan Markle’s Fake Baby Exposed” has garnered tens of thousands of views. The channel presents the notion that baby Sussex is a doll, citing resemblances to doll-like features as evidence.

Another point of contention is that baby Archie appeared motionless in Prince Harry’s arms during the photo op, leading some to conclude that it must be a fake baby. Many viewers echoed this sentiment, with one royal fan commenting that Harry was holding a doll during the photo op, with Meghan allegedly strategically positioning herself to obscure the baby’s face from the camera.

In response to such speculation, others noted stark differences between videos of the Waleses introducing their newborns and Meghan and Harry introducing Archie. Observers pointed out that the Waleses’ babies were visibly active and the parents appeared relaxed, whereas Archie seemed inert, with Meghan showing discomfort and Harry holding onto him tightly. Building on this observation, others remarked that newborns typically move and make noise, unlike the seemingly still Archie.

Some even questioned the timing of Archie’s birth, suspecting that Harry’s comment in an interview indicated that Archie was actually two weeks old at the time of the introduction. During the interview, Harry’s response to a question about Archie’s appearance fueled speculation further. His diplomatic reply, suggesting that babies change rapidly and it’s difficult to determine resemblance early on, was interpreted by some as a slip-up revealing Archie’s true age.

HOT NEWS: 

THE “SHOCKING” SECRET IN WILLIAM – KATE’S WEDDING: KATE DISOBEYED THE ROYAL ORDER TO DO THIS BUT THE REASON BEHIND IT IS SO SWEET

During her wedding with Prince William in 2011, Princess Kate Middleton did not completely follow the instructions of her superiors in the British Royal Family.

The wedding of Prince William and Princess Kate Middleton took place more than 7 years ago, but until now, this is still the Royal wedding that people often talk about. The reason this wedding left such a deep impression on the public is because the bride Kate’s appearance at that time was so graceful and beautiful. Wearing a luxurious yet seductive lace wedding dress from fashion house Alexander McQueen, Kate Middleton captivated millions of people and truly brought the standard image of a Princess as well as a future Queen.

Princess Kate Middleton is stunningly beautiful at her wedding with Prince William, which took place on April 29, 2011.

It seemed that people had discussed everything that could be discussed about Princess Kate’s appearance on her wedding day, from how expensive her dress was, how long it took to complete, to the fact that she took her own life. How to do your makeup, etc. But until recently, a shocking secret related to Kate’s bridal hairstyle was revealed: she went against the British Royal Family’s wishes to do it. hair as you like.

Few people know that behind Princess Kate’s perfect appearance is a story related to how she went against the British Royal Family’s orders to wear her favorite hairstyle.

A beauty with style and demeanor is said to be born to be a Princess, and has almost never broken any royal rules like Kate, but she had the audacity to disobey her superiors’ orders at an important wedding that was worth millions. people looking in? This seemingly absurd story turns out to have many possibilities to be true.

Explore more The 11 most popular wedding dresses of 2018: the one with a low back to show off the bride’s scars, the one that’s simple but extremely luxurious

In the recently released documentary titled William & Kate: The Journey (roughly translated: William & Kate: A Journey), famous reporter specializing in reporting news about the Royal Family, Ashley Pearson, revealed that at first, the Queen The British family wanted Kate Middleton to choose a high bun hairstyle because this is the hairstyle that previous brides in the Royal Family wore.

The British Royal Family wanted Kate to choose a neat bun hairstyle like many previous royal brides, but Kate decided to choose loose, curly hair because this is not only her favorite hairstyle but also the hairstyle Prince William likes. she is the most presentable.

Ashley Pearson said: “Internal sources from the Royal Family said that the superiors had made it very clear that they wanted Kate to wear her hair in a bun at that important wedding. However, Kate herself made a firm decision. insisted that she would wear her hair down and curl it because this was her favorite hairstyle, and more importantly, Prince William also liked her wearing this hairstyle. Finally, the two sides came to a satisfactory agreement both”.

To complete both lines, Kate chose a loose, curly hairstyle with the hair on top of her head gently pinned back.

And we all know what the result will be. Kate Middleton appeared at the ceremony in a loose, curly hairstyle with the hair on top of her head pinned back. With this “half-up, half-down” hairstyle, she both satisfied her own desires and still somewhat pleased her superiors. What a wise choice.

At the end of the wedding, when entertaining guests, Kate was free to let her hair down completely according to her original wishes. This is also the hairstyle that she often wears when appearing in public.